In my particular case, I am a key witness for Keith because of my personal knowledge and experience of the War On Wogs (WOW!)(R) and my person knowledge and experience of him, having picketed with him, and having been his single retained expert witness at his copyright infringement trial, where, as God would have it in this sort of thing, you defended him. And you defended him not without just any witness, but without one of the foremost experts on $cientology's War On Wogs (R) and its attendant insanities; such as the suppressive person doctrine, black PR, fair game, attack the attacker, and use of the law to harass, and the source of that war and those insanities, L. Ron Hubbard.
Keith's sole witness, willing to testify and having been given $150.00 from him as a retainer, was prevented from testifying, as admitted to by $cientology, by the criminal cult's obtaining, on the basis of an impossible, illegal, insane California State Judge's order, a further order that I be fined and jailed, and a warrant for my arrest should I set foot in California.
The basis for the jail order, fine and warrant, as again only God would have it, was a declaration I wrote and sent to Judge Whyte in the Ward, Henson and Erlich cases concerning a threat received from criminal cult lawyer Andy Wilson, after being served with a subpoena duces tecum by Grady.
Being an expert, as I say, by the way, I tailored the declaration, in response to the Wilson threat, so it could be used in oppositions to $cientology's summary adjudication or judgment motions about to fall on Ward, Henson and Erlich. You might look over that declaration and consider what might have happened if at trial Keith had had a live expert witness with, inter alia, all that to say.
To put the rest of the icing on the case, the initial and precipitating reason I left California, and the U$, was my discovery of $cientology's 1023 IR$ submission, on which the tax exemption is based, containing four pages of black PR on me. Which, incidentally, the crime cultists and their crime cult lawyers didn't produce in their various $cientology v. Gerald Armstrong cases from 1992 onward. I only found the cult's 1023 filing because in January, 1997 I got my first internet account, right around the time Grady served me, but years after it might have done some good, and sure was relevant, in all my litigations.
The crime cult, of course, throws its IR$ tax exemption around and files it as an exhibit in every case it files against wogs (R). My little part in all of this is as proof that $cientology obtained its tax exemption (I say in part, because there are undoubtedly other criminal factors) by fraud.
In that sense I have a standing that Keith didn't have in relationship to the IR$ decision regarding the antisocial, antiwog (R) $cientology corporations and people. But once standing is established, I think Keith would be able to join and hence enjoy the fun he's fought for all this time and so richly deserves.
If it is recognized that $cientology's unclean hands, using an illegal order obtained by unclean hands, prevented a defendant's single and absolutely key witness from testifying, I believe that no uncompromised court, no court unoccupied by cult collaborators, would not grant a new trial. And the opportunity exists until such time as $cientology withdraws its warrants against me, cancels its contempt orders, jettisons its judgments, and gives up its ungodly gag <gag> "agreements."
Since Keith was denied his sole witness by $cientology, so was Grady. Didn't Grady see what happened to Keith in a courtroom without a witness? You did, right?
© Gerry Armstrong