On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:01:36 -0700, Jeff Jacobsen <email@example.com> wrote:
These RIC ones are likely to be interesting. I would make a wild guess most of this is from these deadbeat cultists refusing to pay their bills. (At least the ones that aren't Keith.)
>RIC 288551 1997 Brown-Strauss Steel v. Golden Era
>RIC306884 Hoden v. Henson (Keith)
This was a suit based on the same insane allegations featured in the Henson "criminal" suit. (Ie, that it is against the law to picket Scientology and then post about it, that this somehow constitutes some kind of illegal act.)
It was thrown out as not even meeting the level of proof necessary to have a civil trial, on a nonsuit motion by Graham Berry. Somehow the same garbage was successfully turned into a "criminal" case a couple years later by throwing in some Usenet posts that Henson hadn't even written.
>RIC315970 1998 Prince v. Church of Scientology
>RIC325825 1999 Baldi Brothers v. Church of Scientology
>RIC329152 1999 The CIT Group v. Church of Scientology
>RIC352255 2001 Rancho Readt Mix v. Taseco Corporation
Note: Taseco is the contractor that the guy below worked for. My wild guess is that the Rancho Ready Mix company is suing Taseco for exposing them to liability by having an unlicensed driver (Nove).
>RIC356327 2002 Shaner v. Nove
Ashlee Shaner is of course the person killed by the front loader the same month as Stacy Moxon was electrocuted in the electrical vault. Taseco is the contractor that the unlicensed driver Nove was working for.
>next International Protest Dec. 7, 2002. www.primenet.com/~cultxpt/demo.htm