On 30 Apr 2001 18:20:27 -0600, [email protected] (Keith "Justified
And Ancient" Cochran) wrote:
> In a previous post you said something about the reason why the judge wouldn't
> let you mention scumatology is because "the benefits were outweight by the
> predujuice that would be cause".
Yes, this is right out of California Evidence code 352. > Isn't the judge just admitting that if the jury knew the cult was suing
> you, a snowball in a pot of boiling water in hell would have a better chance?
Depends on how many scientologists they managed to get on the jury. Keith Henson