From: "Virginia McClaughry" <[email protected]>
Subject: post 27: more on therese
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:15:33 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Dir I and R
During my last trip to Flag, there were several sessions where I was receiving tailor-made sec check questions. When responded with no, and pushed by the auditor, I would then look at all the areas that I had ever covered in solo, and she would steer me. What was very strange about this was that situations that has been covered in various forms in solo, were now acting as withholds to the auditor, and as a result was spinning me on my certainty, to the end result of that I felt there was nothing good about my last nine years of Solo Nots auditing, and that everything handled in solo was “unknown” to Flag, and was a withhold. I told the auditor of this situation at least twice, and it was essentially ignored.
This does not seem right to me, and was acting as invalidation, and evaluation that these situations (covered in session) were now NEW undisclosed situations.
It resulted in a worsening of the case, and loss of gain and stability pre-ot wise, so I know that standard tech was not being applied.
Auditor’s code points being violated by the above are 1,2,3, and 14. Crimes are:
“Harmful, flagrant, and continued code breaks resulting in important upsets.”
“Using Scientology harmfully”